Skip to main content

​
What is Multi-Party Computation?

Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is a cryptographic technique that enables multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their inputs while keeping those inputs private. Think of it as a way for parties to collaborate on calculations without revealing their sensitive data to each other.

​
The Core Problem

Imagine three companies want to find out which one pays the highest average salary without revealing their actual salary data to competitors. Traditionally, they would need to:
  1. Trust a third party with their sensitive data, or
  2. Reveal their data to each other directly
Both options have serious privacy and competitive disadvantages. MPC provides a third option: compute the answer together without anyone learning anyone else’s private data.

​
How MPC Works

​
The Basic Concept

MPC protocols work by:
  1. Secret Sharing: Each party’s private input is split into multiple “shares” using cryptographic techniques
  2. Distributed Computation: The computation is performed on these shares across multiple nodes
  3. Result Reconstruction: The final result is reconstructed from the output shares
Throughout this process, no single party (including the computing nodes) ever sees the raw private data.

​
A Simple Example

Consider two parties, Alice and Bob, who want to compute (Alice's number + Bob's number) > 100 without revealing their numbers: 
Alice has: 75 (secret)
Bob has: 30 (secret)

1. Secret Sharing:
   Alice's 75 → shares: [23, 17, 35]
   Bob's 30 → shares: [8, 12, 10]

2. Distributed Computation:
   Node 1: 23 + 8 = 31
   Node 2: 17 + 12 = 29
   Node 3: 35 + 10 = 45

   Each node computes: share > threshold_share

3. Result Reconstruction:
   Combine results → 105 > 100 = true
Neither Alice nor Bob learns the other’s number, but they both learn that their sum exceeds 100.

​
Types of MPC

​
By Security Model

Semi-Honest (Honest-but-Curious)
  • Parties follow the protocol correctly but try to learn extra information
  • More efficient but assumes participants won’t actively cheat
  • Suitable for many real-world scenarios where reputation matters
Malicious
  • Parties may deviate from the protocol arbitrarily
  • Stronger security guarantees but higher computational cost
  • Required when participants cannot be trusted to follow rules

​
By Network Assumptions

Honest Majority
  • Assumes more than half of participants are honest
  • Generally more efficient
  • Used by protocols like Stoffel’s HoneyBadger MPC
Dishonest Majority
  • Works even if most participants are malicious
  • Higher computational and communication overhead
  • Typically used in two-party scenarios

​
Real-World Applications

​
Financial Services

Private Credit Scoring 
Multiple banks → Collaborative credit risk assessment → Individual scores
(without sharing customer data)
Market Data Analysis 
Trading firms → Joint market analysis → Insights
(without revealing trading strategies)

​
Healthcare

Medical Research 
Hospitals → Disease pattern analysis → Research findings
(without sharing patient records)
Drug Discovery 
Pharmaceutical companies → Compound effectiveness → New drugs
(without sharing proprietary research)

​
Government & Compliance

Tax Fraud Detection 
Tax agencies → Cross-border fraud detection → Investigation leads
(without sharing taxpayer information)
Supply Chain Verification 
Companies → Ethical sourcing verification → Compliance reports
(without revealing supplier details)

​
MPC vs Other Privacy Technologies

TechnologyPrivacy LevelPerformanceUse Cases
MPCHigh - inputs remain secretModerateMulti-party computation
Homomorphic EncryptionHigh - single party holds dataLowOutsourced computation
Differential PrivacyMedium - statistical privacyHighData analysis/sharing
Secure EnclavesHigh - hardware-basedHighTrusted execution

​
Challenges and Limitations

​
Performance Considerations

Computational Overhead
  • MPC operations are significantly slower than plain computation
  • Cryptographic operations add substantial cost
  • Trade-off between security and performance
Communication Complexity
  • Multiple rounds of communication between parties
  • Network latency affects overall computation time
  • Bandwidth requirements can be substantial

​
Practical Constraints

Setup Requirements
  • Coordinating multiple parties can be complex
  • Trust assumptions about protocol participants
  • Key management and secure channels
Programming Complexity
  • Traditional programming models don’t directly apply
  • Need specialized tools and languages
  • Debugging and testing require new approaches

​
The Promise of MPC

Despite these challenges, MPC offers unprecedented opportunities:

​
Enabling New Business Models

Data Collaboration Without Exposure
  • Competitors can collaborate on common problems
  • Data monetization without data sharing
  • Cross-organizational analytics
Regulatory Compliance
  • GDPR-compliant data analysis
  • Financial privacy regulations
  • Healthcare data protection

​
Technical Advantages

Distributed Trust
  • No single point of failure
  • Reduced trust requirements
  • Cryptographic security guarantees
Selective Disclosure
  • Compute only what’s needed
  • Reveal only specific results
  • Fine-grained privacy control

​
MPC in Practice

Modern MPC is becoming practical for real applications: Performance Improvements
  • Specialized protocols for specific use cases
  • Hardware acceleration (GPUs, specialized chips)
  • Optimized implementations
Developer Tools
  • High-level programming languages
  • Automated optimization
  • Debugging and testing frameworks
Deployment Infrastructure
  • Cloud-based MPC services
  • Standardized protocols
  • Integration with existing systems
This is where Stoffel comes in - providing a complete framework that makes MPC accessible to developers without requiring deep cryptographic expertise.

​
Next Steps

To understand how Stoffel addresses these challenges and makes MPC practical for developers, see: