What is Multi-Party Computation?
Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is a cryptographic technique that enables multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their inputs while keeping those inputs private. Think of it as a way for parties to collaborate on calculations without revealing their sensitive data to each other.
The Core Problem
Imagine three companies want to find out which one pays the highest average salary without revealing their actual salary data to competitors. Traditionally, they would need to:
- Trust a third party with their sensitive data, or
- Reveal their data to each other directly
Both options have serious privacy and competitive disadvantages. MPC provides a third option: compute the answer together without anyone learning anyone else's private data.
How MPC Works
The Basic Concept
MPC protocols work by:
- Secret Sharing: Each party's private input is split into multiple "shares" using cryptographic techniques
- Distributed Computation: The computation is performed on these shares across multiple nodes
- Result Reconstruction: The final result is reconstructed from the output shares
Throughout this process, no single party (including the computing nodes) ever sees the raw private data.
A Simple Example
Consider two parties, Alice and Bob, who want to compute (Alice's number + Bob's number) > 100
without revealing their numbers:
Alice has: 75 (secret)
Bob has: 30 (secret)
1. Secret Sharing:
Alice's 75 → shares: [23, 17, 35]
Bob's 30 → shares: [8, 12, 10]
2. Distributed Computation:
Node 1: 23 + 8 = 31
Node 2: 17 + 12 = 29
Node 3: 35 + 10 = 45
Each node computes: share > threshold_share
3. Result Reconstruction:
Combine results → 105 > 100 = true
Neither Alice nor Bob learns the other's number, but they both learn that their sum exceeds 100.
Types of MPC
By Security Model
Semi-Honest (Honest-but-Curious)
- Parties follow the protocol correctly but try to learn extra information
- More efficient but assumes participants won't actively cheat
- Suitable for many real-world scenarios where reputation matters
Malicious
- Parties may deviate from the protocol arbitrarily
- Stronger security guarantees but higher computational cost
- Required when participants cannot be trusted to follow rules
By Network Assumptions
Honest Majority
- Assumes more than half of participants are honest
- Generally more efficient
- Used by protocols like Stoffel's HoneyBadger MPC
Dishonest Majority
- Works even if most participants are malicious
- Higher computational and communication overhead
- Typically used in two-party scenarios
Real-World Applications
Financial Services
Private Credit Scoring
Multiple banks → Collaborative credit risk assessment → Individual scores
(without sharing customer data)
Market Data Analysis
Trading firms → Joint market analysis → Insights
(without revealing trading strategies)
Healthcare
Medical Research
Hospitals → Disease pattern analysis → Research findings
(without sharing patient records)
Drug Discovery
Pharmaceutical companies → Compound effectiveness → New drugs
(without sharing proprietary research)
Government & Compliance
Tax Fraud Detection
Tax agencies → Cross-border fraud detection → Investigation leads
(without sharing taxpayer information)
Supply Chain Verification
Companies → Ethical sourcing verification → Compliance reports
(without revealing supplier details)
MPC vs Other Privacy Technologies
Technology | Privacy Level | Performance | Use Cases |
---|---|---|---|
MPC | High - inputs remain secret | Moderate | Multi-party computation |
Homomorphic Encryption | High - single party holds data | Low | Outsourced computation |
Differential Privacy | Medium - statistical privacy | High | Data analysis/sharing |
Secure Enclaves | High - hardware-based | High | Trusted execution |
Challenges and Limitations
Performance Considerations
Computational Overhead
- MPC operations are significantly slower than plain computation
- Cryptographic operations add substantial cost
- Trade-off between security and performance
Communication Complexity
- Multiple rounds of communication between parties
- Network latency affects overall computation time
- Bandwidth requirements can be substantial
Practical Constraints
Setup Requirements
- Coordinating multiple parties can be complex
- Trust assumptions about protocol participants
- Key management and secure channels
Programming Complexity
- Traditional programming models don't directly apply
- Need specialized tools and languages
- Debugging and testing require new approaches
The Promise of MPC
Despite these challenges, MPC offers unprecedented opportunities:
Enabling New Business Models
Data Collaboration Without Exposure
- Competitors can collaborate on common problems
- Data monetization without data sharing
- Cross-organizational analytics
Regulatory Compliance
- GDPR-compliant data analysis
- Financial privacy regulations
- Healthcare data protection
Technical Advantages
Distributed Trust
- No single point of failure
- Reduced trust requirements
- Cryptographic security guarantees
Selective Disclosure
- Compute only what's needed
- Reveal only specific results
- Fine-grained privacy control
MPC in Practice
Modern MPC is becoming practical for real applications:
Performance Improvements
- Specialized protocols for specific use cases
- Hardware acceleration (GPUs, specialized chips)
- Optimized implementations
Developer Tools
- High-level programming languages
- Automated optimization
- Debugging and testing frameworks
Deployment Infrastructure
- Cloud-based MPC services
- Standardized protocols
- Integration with existing systems
This is where Stoffel comes in - providing a complete framework that makes MPC accessible to developers without requiring deep cryptographic expertise.
Next Steps
To understand how Stoffel addresses these challenges and makes MPC practical for developers, see:
- Why Stoffel? - How Stoffel solves MPC development challenges
- Ecosystem Overview - Complete overview of Stoffel's components