What is Multi-Party Computation?

Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is a cryptographic technique that enables multiple parties to jointly compute a function over their inputs while keeping those inputs private. Think of it as a way for parties to collaborate on calculations without revealing their sensitive data to each other.

The Core Problem

Imagine three companies want to find out which one pays the highest average salary without revealing their actual salary data to competitors. Traditionally, they would need to:

  1. Trust a third party with their sensitive data, or
  2. Reveal their data to each other directly

Both options have serious privacy and competitive disadvantages. MPC provides a third option: compute the answer together without anyone learning anyone else's private data.

How MPC Works

The Basic Concept

MPC protocols work by:

  1. Secret Sharing: Each party's private input is split into multiple "shares" using cryptographic techniques
  2. Distributed Computation: The computation is performed on these shares across multiple nodes
  3. Result Reconstruction: The final result is reconstructed from the output shares

Throughout this process, no single party (including the computing nodes) ever sees the raw private data.

A Simple Example

Consider two parties, Alice and Bob, who want to compute (Alice's number + Bob's number) > 100 without revealing their numbers:

Alice has: 75 (secret)
Bob has: 30 (secret)

1. Secret Sharing:
   Alice's 75 → shares: [23, 17, 35]
   Bob's 30 → shares: [8, 12, 10]

2. Distributed Computation:
   Node 1: 23 + 8 = 31
   Node 2: 17 + 12 = 29
   Node 3: 35 + 10 = 45

   Each node computes: share > threshold_share

3. Result Reconstruction:
   Combine results → 105 > 100 = true

Neither Alice nor Bob learns the other's number, but they both learn that their sum exceeds 100.

Types of MPC

By Security Model

Semi-Honest (Honest-but-Curious)

  • Parties follow the protocol correctly but try to learn extra information
  • More efficient but assumes participants won't actively cheat
  • Suitable for many real-world scenarios where reputation matters

Malicious

  • Parties may deviate from the protocol arbitrarily
  • Stronger security guarantees but higher computational cost
  • Required when participants cannot be trusted to follow rules

By Network Assumptions

Honest Majority

  • Assumes more than half of participants are honest
  • Generally more efficient
  • Used by protocols like Stoffel's HoneyBadger MPC

Dishonest Majority

  • Works even if most participants are malicious
  • Higher computational and communication overhead
  • Typically used in two-party scenarios

Real-World Applications

Financial Services

Private Credit Scoring

Multiple banks → Collaborative credit risk assessment → Individual scores
(without sharing customer data)

Market Data Analysis

Trading firms → Joint market analysis → Insights
(without revealing trading strategies)

Healthcare

Medical Research

Hospitals → Disease pattern analysis → Research findings
(without sharing patient records)

Drug Discovery

Pharmaceutical companies → Compound effectiveness → New drugs
(without sharing proprietary research)

Government & Compliance

Tax Fraud Detection

Tax agencies → Cross-border fraud detection → Investigation leads
(without sharing taxpayer information)

Supply Chain Verification

Companies → Ethical sourcing verification → Compliance reports
(without revealing supplier details)

MPC vs Other Privacy Technologies

TechnologyPrivacy LevelPerformanceUse Cases
MPCHigh - inputs remain secretModerateMulti-party computation
Homomorphic EncryptionHigh - single party holds dataLowOutsourced computation
Differential PrivacyMedium - statistical privacyHighData analysis/sharing
Secure EnclavesHigh - hardware-basedHighTrusted execution

Challenges and Limitations

Performance Considerations

Computational Overhead

  • MPC operations are significantly slower than plain computation
  • Cryptographic operations add substantial cost
  • Trade-off between security and performance

Communication Complexity

  • Multiple rounds of communication between parties
  • Network latency affects overall computation time
  • Bandwidth requirements can be substantial

Practical Constraints

Setup Requirements

  • Coordinating multiple parties can be complex
  • Trust assumptions about protocol participants
  • Key management and secure channels

Programming Complexity

  • Traditional programming models don't directly apply
  • Need specialized tools and languages
  • Debugging and testing require new approaches

The Promise of MPC

Despite these challenges, MPC offers unprecedented opportunities:

Enabling New Business Models

Data Collaboration Without Exposure

  • Competitors can collaborate on common problems
  • Data monetization without data sharing
  • Cross-organizational analytics

Regulatory Compliance

  • GDPR-compliant data analysis
  • Financial privacy regulations
  • Healthcare data protection

Technical Advantages

Distributed Trust

  • No single point of failure
  • Reduced trust requirements
  • Cryptographic security guarantees

Selective Disclosure

  • Compute only what's needed
  • Reveal only specific results
  • Fine-grained privacy control

MPC in Practice

Modern MPC is becoming practical for real applications:

Performance Improvements

  • Specialized protocols for specific use cases
  • Hardware acceleration (GPUs, specialized chips)
  • Optimized implementations

Developer Tools

  • High-level programming languages
  • Automated optimization
  • Debugging and testing frameworks

Deployment Infrastructure

  • Cloud-based MPC services
  • Standardized protocols
  • Integration with existing systems

This is where Stoffel comes in - providing a complete framework that makes MPC accessible to developers without requiring deep cryptographic expertise.

Next Steps

To understand how Stoffel addresses these challenges and makes MPC practical for developers, see: